Linguistic Human Rights “Linguicism”
Debi Novianingrum
1110026000018
BSI / 5B
UAS General Linguistic 2
State Islamic University Jakarta
A.
Introduction
Linguistic human rights
are the right to use indigenous language of the minorities without any
discrimination. Linguistic human right
provisionally regards in relation to the mother tongue(s) as consisting of the
right to identify with it/ them, and to educated and public services through
the medium of it/them. Mother tongue is defined as the language(s) one has
learned first and identifies with (Kangas & Philipson,1995). Base on other
source Linguistic Human Right as a category of human right i.e. universal right
belong to all persons, linguistic rights are base on the idea of human dignity
and worth as well as cultural tolerance. Examples of linguistic human right are
the rights of a minority language community to receive education in their
language and of people to receive governmental services in language other than
socially dominant language. Although various proposal have been put forth to
define such linguistic rights, there is so far to general agreement on them
comparable to the principle of human rights codified by the United Nation
(Richard, Schmidt,2002). In relation to other language linguistic human rights
consisting of the right to learn an official language in the country of
residence in its standard form (Kangas ,Philipson, 1995).
Human rights have a
pedigree going back several centuries, to the transition from absolutism to
more democratic social structures in Western societies. The treaties signed at
the conclusion of the 1914-1918 war attempted to ensure international
recognition of the rights of many minorities in central and Eastern Europe. The
primary goal of all declarations of human rights, whether national or
international is to protect the individual against arbitrary or unjust
treatment. Human rights declaration have progressed through various phases: the
first generation related to personal freedoms, civil and political right; the
second generation related to economic, social, and cultural rights; and the
third generations covers ‘ solidarity’ rights (peace, development, an unspoilt
environment), (Philipson, 1992). And the
first covenant mentioned linguistic right is in the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights (article 27, 1966) which declares: in those States
in which ethnic, religious, or linguistic minorities exist, person belonging to
such minorities shall be denied the right, in community with other members of
their group, to enjoy their own culture to profess and practice their own
religion, or to use their own language. Most of people using minority language
are discriminated by people who using dominant language. Some groups are not
allowed to identify with their mother tongue (Kangas & Philipson, 1995). this
declaration very important to protect the minorities using their own language. Linguicism
has taken over from racism as more subtle way of hierarchization social group
in the contemporary world (Philipson, 1992). as a minority groups migrant/
immigrant always find the problem of discrimination whether race, skin color,
language or culture. Although there is an agreement about language rights but
minority groups still get the discrimination. Minority groups do not have
influence to a country and become invisible. This paper will explain about what
linguicism is and forms of linguicism.
B. Content
Linguicism defined as ideologies, structures and practice which are
used to legitimate, effectuate and reproduce an unequal division of power and
resources (both material and non material ) between groups which are defined on
the basis race, ethnicity, or language (Kangas & Philipson, 1995). In other
sources linguicism by analogy with
“racism” and “sexism” a term proposed by philipson to describe practice,
beliefs, policies, etc, that are designed to promote and maintain unequal
division of power, prestige, resources, etc between groups on the basis of
language (Richard, Schmidt, 2002). Linguiscm
also related to linguistic imperialism described as the theory that languages
may be seen as occupying a dominant or dominated role in society. It is argued
that English plays a dominant role internationally and plays a role in
maintaining the economic and political dominance of some societies over others,
because of the role of English as the dominant international language. Many
other languages have been prevented from going through processes of development
and expansion. The spread of English is viewed as imposing aspect of Aglo-Saxon
Judaeo- Christian culture and causing a threat to the cultures and languages of
non English speaking countries (Richard,Schmidt, 2002).
Linguicism is dissimilar from
other ‘ism’ such as sexism and racism, in so far as it is language rather than
gender or race which is the crucial criterion in the beliefs and structure
which result in unequal power and resource allocation (Philipson, 1992). Language discrimination occurs when a person
treated differently by native speakers, because of characteristic of that
person speech. In employee situation for example, an employee may be being
subjected in work place if the work place has a “speak English only” policy but
the employee use another language than English. The employee may be a victim of
language discrimination because he or she treated differently by the other
employee who use English as their mother tongue. Outside the employment context,
language discrimination occurs if a person denied to have access of business or
government services because he or she do not speak English. Language is a form
cultural capital and it also can be used for cooperation with groups which have
power in economic, social, and cultural. This implies that individual or groups
speaking global language have an advantages over their counterparts whose
mother tongue are in low social scale which is hardly to debate in economic
context. Many benefits to those speaking in major language like English. Globalization
is also important in language discrimination (linguicism) in a country. Because
of globalization lead to restriction the movement of minority groups. They can
not use their own language to develop abilities in economy, social, and
cultural.
Globalization is like
colonialism. The International Monetary Fund has more or less become the rich
countries instrument for the economic and ideological control of the poor
country (Philipson, 1992). For example in Indonesia, most of the companies in
Indonesia require their employee to use English both passive and active. If
they can not use and understand English, they get a few opportunities to
compete in the works or business. It is possible if globalization has grown up
hundred percent in Indonesia, Indonesian culture will be forgotten and the
Indonesian people who have limited language being worse because of limiting
jobs.
In other hand linguiscm occurs in education. Linguistic
imperialism on the part of the speakers of any language exemplifies linguicism. Linguicism may be in operation simultaneously with sexism, racism,
or classism, but linguicism refers
exclusively to ideologies and structures where language is the means for
effecting or maintaining a unequal allocation of power and resources. This
could apply, for instance, in a school in which the mother tongue of some
children, from an immigrant or indigenous minority background, are ignored, and
this as consequences for their learning (Philipson, 1992). Ethno linguistic
minority children, indigenous and immigrants, often attend pre-school and
schools where no teachers understand their language and where it is not used,
either as a subject or as a medium of education (Kangas & Philipson, 1995).
The school is always forced to use culture or dominant language even though
there are student who do not use culture or dominant language. For example, in
United States accent of non native English or linguistic minority always
related to discrimination. A lot of immigrant whose live in Unites State and
send their children in school which use dominant language. As the minority
groups the children still use their accent for daily conversation. Accent is
also very linked of linguicism of daily life conversation of non native English
speakers in United State. Accent
discrimination refers to any case where acoustic speech pattern (i.e.
pronunciation) are implicated in a claim of discrimination (Mounro, 2003). Some
linguistic studies have been conducted in other countries such as Canada
(Mounro, 2003) and the United Kingdom with an effort to describe how accent,
particularly foreign accent makes negative impression on native speakers
(Bisop, Coupland, Garret, 2005). In some cases, non native speakers perceive
oppressed because of the use of accent. It connected with race, nationality,
and physical appearance. In other hand some non native speakers took advantage
of this oppression as a positive identity marker. Regardless of whether accent was associated with positive or
negative features, the frustration, anger, and inferiority that respondent felt
due to accent of discrimination in interpersonal communication with native
speaker were evident, demonstrating that oppression should be limited. Language
ideologies are one factor divide an individuals into groups exclude certain
group from power position and make individual misrecognize the existing of
social hierarchies. Accent could be one of the important factors that determine
one’s language standardness. A person accent is influenced by his /her group
characteristic.
A person accent
reflects his/her social group membership and status, Such as accent of black
people, India, Singapore, England, or Asian. Language discrimination often
found in school because each student from different social, culture and
language or accent, especially in country where many migrant live. Because
language minority can not use in school, with forced children from minorities
group should follow the language that used in school. Minority languages are
allowed to use in private but not in school. As describe on European Charter
for regional and minority languages article 27 that the right to use a regional
or minority language in private and public life is an inalienable right (Kangas
& Philipson, 1995). This is a form of real linguicism and the children who the victims. In United States,
black people language and accent always get a stigma.
From the speaking way, black people get a
stereotyping as a lazy people. Because of the way they speak are abbreviated
and do not use English grammar properly. As mentioned above, the way a person
speak and person accent can reflect the social status and characteristic of
group. If linguicism occurs in
school, the most likely student from minorities becomes uneducated. Because,
the teacher does not understand what the student say and ignored them. Such as
in one elementary school in America, there are African-American students used
African-American language and being discriminated. When they talked something
to their teacher, the teacher did not understand what they talked, the teacher
ignored them, and treat them differently. Many declarations to protect the
minority especially in education, such as The Charter of United Nations,
Universal Declaration of Human Right, The UN Convention on The Right of
Children, The Council of Europe Convention For The Protection of Human Right
and Fundamental Freedoms, The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Right,
American Declaration of The Right and Duties of Man, and The last is American
Convention on Human Rights. Minority groups not only a groups that do not have
influence in a country, but also groups that have characteristic like deaf
community. Deaf community has a characteristic in their language. They use sign
language to send information to other people. The deaf do not see themselves as
disabled, but rather as a distinct minority group. Like other members of
linguistic minorities, members of deaf signing communities often experience
systemic linguicism in education. In spite of the evidence for the importance
for early exposure to a signed language, many deaf children are denied access
until later in life. This current reality falls under the notion of linguicism.
In sum, then, audism may be seen both
as a subset of ableism and
linguicism, forming its own unique set of situation, experience and
discrimination (Bauman, Simser, Hannan, 2010). Audism is a form of discrimination base on lack of accommodation of
physical difference (Bauman, Simser, Hannan, 2010). Ableism described as prejudicial attitudes and
discriminatory behavior towards person with a disability. Definition ableism hinge on one understanding of normal ability and the rights
and benefit afforded to persons deemed normal. Some persons believe it is ableism that prevent disable people from
participating in the social fabric of their communities, rather than impairment
in physical, mental or emotional ability. Ableism
includes attitudes and behavior emanating from individuals communities and
institutions as well as from physical and social environment (Levi, 2006). The
use of sign language is very difficult to be accepted by normal society.
Therefore, the deaf often get discrimination due to differences in using
communication method. Generally, hearing people refused to communicate with the
deaf, because of the difficulties of using the language. In an effort to
eliminate discriminatory practices again person with disabilities
international, national and provincial act declaration and policies have been
put in place. The basic promise of these documents is to ensure that the human
worth of person with disabilities is not diminished in many ways. In what
follows, this paper present relevant aspect of this important document , from
international to national provincial level. These various document may be used
to support action to mitigate the devastating affect of ableism, audism, and linguicism. The document such as UN
Convention on the Rights of Person with Disabilities, UN Convention on the
Right of the Children, Declaration on the Right of Person Belonging to National
or Ethnic Religious and Linguistic Minorities, and Policy Statement on Education Right for Deaf
Children.
C. Conclusion
In conclusion, it is
important to note that we define racism, ethnicism, and linguicism as both ideological and structural. Racism is not just a
question of people being ill-willed, ignorant or misinformed. Ethnicism is not
only people’s attitude or prejudice towards other individual or groups. Linguicism is not only an information
problem (that all languages are of unequal worth, and if this is understood and
respected, problems of discrimination will disappear or at least diminish
(Kangas & Philipson,1995).
Ethnicism and linguicism socially judged the resources
of powerless groups so they become invisible group and seen as handicaps. The source
of minority group becomes meaningless both in language and culture to take
position power in social, economy, cultural, or government. In other hand
dominant language can take a power in a social, economy, cultural, or
government because their resources are recognized.
Linguicism is a major factor in determining whether speakers of
particular languages are allowed to enjoy their linguistic human rights. Lack
of this rights for instance their absence from school time-tables, makes
minority languages invisible. Alternatively, minority languages are seen as
handicaps, which prevent minority children from acquiring the valued resources
(the majority language), so minority children should get rid of them in their
own interest. At the same time, many minorities, especially children, are in
fact prevented from fully acquiring majority resources, especially majority
languages, by disabling educational structures, when their instruction is
organized through the medium of the majority languages in ways which contradict
most scientific evidence (Kanga & Philipson, 1995). Minorities groups
should not be underestimated, because the minority is entitled to get the
rights. Everybody has the right and chance to survive in this world. No
exception minority groups, their existence should recognize to balance the
world. If all the world people respect each other likely, the world will be
less of the social problem such as linguicism.
The differences occurs quite naturally n this world. Because the world’s
population is from different culture, therefore it takes a different
understanding in order to undertake the life.
D.
References
Kangas, TS, & Philipson R 1995, Linguistic Human Rights : Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin;New York.
Richard, JC, & Schimdt, R 2002, Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching &Applied Linguistic,
Pearson Education Limited, Malaysia.
Philipson, Robert, 1992,
Linguistic Imperialism, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Mounro, M.J. 2003, ‘A Premiere on Accent Discrimination in
the Canadian Context’, TESL Canada Journal: Revue TESL du Canada, 20(2),
38-51.
Bishop, H, Coupland, N, & Garret, P (2005), ‘Conceptual
Accent Evaluation: Thirty years of Accent Prejudice in the UK’, Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 37,
131-154.
Bauman, L, Simpser, S, & Hannan, G (2010), ‘Beyond
Ableism and Audism: Achieving Human Rights for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Citizen’,
The Canadian Hearing Society Barrier-Free
Education Initiative, 12-19.
Levi, S 2006, “Ableism” Encyclopedia
of Diasability, Ed. Gary L. Albrecht, Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publication.
Komentar
Posting Komentar